On Montag, 6. Juli 2020 21:48:19 CEST Maury Markowitz wrote: > > On Jul 6, 2020, at 1:30 PM, Christian Schoenebeck > > <schoeneb...@crudebyte.com> wrote: Which would resolve that ambiguity of > > your example, if it actually exists, as I have never seen "FOREX" as > > valid BASIC loop definition before, if there is, sources for that > > specification appreciated. > > BASIC Computer Games, Super Star Trek, page 159, line 530: > > 530 FORI=1TO9:C(I,1)=0:C(I,2)=0:NEXTI > > Super Star Trek is one of the best test codes you can find, it has an > example of practically every construct in "standard" BASIC, with the > exception of "GO TO" as opposed to "GOTO", which some considered to be a > separate token (likely those from houses with prior JOSS/FOCAL experience).
Ok, no idea where one can see the original code (if public at all). I just found this: http://newton.freehostia.com/hp/bas/TREKPT.txt which uses 'LET' keyword in front of all variable assignments. But it is probably a modified code, as it uses clean white spaces around all 'for' keywords as well. [shrug] Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck
