Tracy R Reed wrote:
> Mark Burgess wrote:
>  > Hi Elaine - Unspecified refusal is a deliberately obtuse error so that
>  > potential hackers will not know why the faliure occurred.
> 
> Cfengine is supposed to auth with keys right? If you don't have the 
> right key you don't get in. Do you not have faith in the key system?

No, and neither should you. Security != encryption.

> And even if I could understand why you wouldn't tell a hacker
> (although in most cases it's the sysadmin) specifics about why a
> failure occurred shouldn't the server itself log the problem in great
> detail in the logs so these things aren't so hard to figure out?
> 
> I have spent a lot of time debugging authentication problems over the
> last few weeks of implementing cfengine on our network. It seems that
> the hostname must match the forward dns which must match the reverse
> dns and the ip must be in the cfservd.conf as well as the domain and
> you must have the right key or trustkeys turned on (bad idea)
> and...what else is there? There are a ton of little details that must
> all be just right. It's almost like there should be a checklist or
> something. If you are a bad guy you won't have a key so even if you do
> get everything set up there is no problem.
> 

This is what that -d2 is for.

-- 
Mark Burgess

Professor of Network and System Administration
Oslo University College

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272            Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax : +47 22453205            WWW  :  http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
[email protected]
http://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

Reply via email to