Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: evaluation of variables
Author: joke
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,18954,18970#msg-18970

Yeah Joke is a common nickname for Johann turned into an actual first name in 
my case.

As guessed right I use the execresult() function to build a list of 
configuration files to include. I understand that it's not the recommend way to 
do it but it seems to be the only way to include a wildcard list of *.cf 
configuration files. I know that including a wildcard list of configuration 
files is considered to be dangerous but I don't see any reason why not to. So 
all I can do use execresult() and hope cfengine will cope and still fit my 
needs.

I'm trying to evaluate cfengine as a configuration management. It's common to 
do such an evaluation based on a small custom setup and estimate the whole 
system based on that and assume the whole system will scale linear at best. 
There are very few systems which scale inverse proportionality.

In this case of process forking scalability refers to the complexity of the 
configuration rules. Since cfengine doesn't run on a Plan 9 system it's 
unlikely processes are spawned across network boundaries.

One of the main advantages of cfengine compared to cfengine seems to be that 
it's written in C. It doesn't require ruby to be installed and most of all it 
can be linked statically. That's what I find most attractive.

_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
[email protected]
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

Reply via email to