On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 15:11 +0200, Mark Burgess wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:39 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > Dorland > > You're right - this is an arbitrary decision, taken early on. The > relevant sizes are > > CF_MAXVARSIZE 1024 > CF_BUFSIZE > CF_MAXVARSIZE > CF_EXPANDSIZE > CF_BUFSIZE > > > > If you want to increase these sizes in cf.defs.h then make sure that you > increase them all. A variable can be a part of a buffer, so if you > expand MAXVARSIZE into a CF_BUFSIZE, there needs to be room for it...
Is there a good reason for it to still be so small? With list variables especially you run into the limit quickly. With machines these days, doubling or quadrupling this shouldn't make a significant impact on memory usage. Dynamically sized variables would be best, but that's probably cfengine 3 territory. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] WSG 514.398-5023 ext. 09562 _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
