I sign my configs with gnupg, and my update script checks for a valid sig before installing new config files.
You could do the same things but require a dual signing. Russell On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:58:28AM -0700, Martin, Jason H wrote: > Along the same lines, has anyone implemented a system such that there is > no one person capable of pushing out changes? I'm talking about a > system analogous to the nuclear missile keys that require 2 people to > agree to launch. > > The scenario here is how would the college protect itself from Jason > Edgecombe, as a top-level SA, deciding to bring down the entire > university infrastruture. > > CFE doesn't support this directly, but perhaps it could be managed via a > module. I'm thinking it'd have to be based on two different master > servers agreeing on a configuration, with discrepencies causing CFE to > fail into a internal-maintenance-only mode. Assuming that each master > server has a mutually exclusive set of root users, it'd have to be > something that none of them could subvert on their own. > > Thank you, > -Jason Martin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > org] On Behalf Of Mark Burgess > > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:34 AM > > To: Jason Edgecombe > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Tiered admins with cfengine > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 09:56 -0400, Jason Edgecombe wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I work at a university, and we are currently using cfengine in our > > > college to manage some linux and Mac machines. In our > > college, there are > > > two admins including myself who are trusted and have total > > control of > > > the cfengine config. > > > > > > Using cfengine has been proposed as being adopted by the entire > > > University for Mac administration. My concern is how do we > > inherit the > > > campus config and only let people in our college modify the > > config that > > > affects our machines. > > > > > > For example, I am in the College of Arts & Sciences and I can only > > > change the cfengine configs for machines in my college. The > > college of > > > Architecture would only have access to their machines, but we both > > > inheirt the changes pushed out by central IT. > > > I simply want to limit the effects of accidental changes made by > > > different admins. It's not just newbieness that I'm worried > > about. I > > > don't have a full understanding of what my changes might do > > to another > > > college's computers. > > > > > > Basically, how can we partition the cfengine set up between admins, > > > but > > > still inherit a config from central it? Do we have to use different > > > cfengine servers for this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jason > > > > Hi Jason - you don't have to use different cfengine servers > > for this, but you could, The way to inherit things is to use > > overridable "includes". One way to organize the permissions > > is to use CVS or subversion and put the different files in > > different projects so that one needs permission to edit them. > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Help-cfengine mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-> cfengine > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
