If you ever have reason to rerun this test, I think it would be useful to include the relative timings when the files are *not* removed between runs. Under most circumstances the files will not have changed in between a given cfengine run, so it is arguably more important to measure the protocol performance under those circumstances.
-Jason Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > org] On Behalf Of Andy Mayhew > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:49 PM > To: Pletan, Ray > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Cfengine over ssh tunnel > > > This is fairly out of date, but this paper I wrote talks a > bit about tunneling cfengine. It maybe of some help. > http://icewire.com/writing/papers/2001-lisa29/ > > But I would > avoid doing this. At least the way I incorporated ssh > tunnels was very resource intensive and slowed down the > entire transfer process. > > --Andy Mayhew > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:37:33PM -0500, Pletan, Ray wrote: > > Has anyone gotten cfengine working using ssh tunneling, i.e. > > ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] <BLOCKED::mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -R > > 5308:localhost:5308 /var/cfengine/bin/cfagent -v > update.conf refuses > > to overwrite itself with messages such as: > > cf:cfengine::/var/cfengine/inputs/update.conf:54: Image loop: > > file/dir copies to itself or missing destination file > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Help-cfengine mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine > > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-> cfengine > _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
