Well, the limit *is* currently configurable, so long as it is between 1 and 1000.
-Jason Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: David Masterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:53 AM > To: Mark Burgess > Cc: Martin, Jason H; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Max cfservd connections > > > A large system with many network connections in an > environment supporting thousands of machines and (for > whatever reason) no use of SplayTime? > > Also consider the reverse -- a tightly controlled *small* > system that a user wants to severely limit the maxprocesses > to prevent runaways, so he lowers maxprocesses. > > Mark Burgess wrote: > > Fair enough - it was meant to be a silly number. I did not > anticipate > > anyone contemplating this. I would be interested to know he > > circumstances in which it is actual to expect 1000 simulaneous > > connections to a single machine. > > > > M > > > > On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 10:13 -0700, David Masterson wrote: > >> Arbitrary numbers should be configuration items. ;-) > >> > >> Mark Burgess wrote: > >>> This is just an arbitrary number. Most systems will not > want to go > >>> higher -- but if you do, then change it. M > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 16:14 -0700, Martin, Jason H wrote: > >>>> I'm curious, does anyone know why cfservd is limited to 1000 > >>>> concurrent connections? > >>>> > >>>>> From the latest cfservd.c: > >>>> if ((CFD_MAXPROCESSES < 1) || (CFD_MAXPROCESSES > 1000)) { > >>>> FatalError("cfservd MaxConnections with silly > value"); > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> Thank you, > >>>> -Jason Martin > > _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
