Some years ago there were problems with maximized frames on Windows. It was
maximized to the whole screen (like here) and the frame was movable.

Is the frame movable?
On Jan 3, 2014 6:11 PM, "Raymond Zeitler" <rzeit...@phonon.com> wrote:

> Hi Joon:
>
> I use this to set frame parameters:
>
> (setq initial-frame-alist '((top . 0) (left . 0)
>                             (width . 135) (height . 67)
>                             (cursor-type . bar)
>                             (font . "-outline-Bitstream Vera Sans
> Mono-normal-r-normal-normal-12-90-96-96-c-70-iso8859-1")))
>
> Perhaps it will inspire a solution.
>
> - Ray
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:37:19 +0900
> From: Joon Ro <joonhyoung...@gmail.com>
> To: "help-emacs-windows@gnu.org" <help-emacs-windows@gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [h-e-w] Emacs windows goes "under" the vertical taskbar
>         when    maximized
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cabeq5b_aacuus9k+cm-9+k8wrtdn4tw9nyrzrw5fjos5e-x...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> -snip-
>
> But then, I found the culprit. I have the following in my ``.emacs``:
>
> ```lisp
> (add-hook 'after-make-frame-functions
>   (if window-system
>     (progn
>         (cond ((eq system-type 'gnu/linux)
>                  ;(set-face-attribute 'default nil :font
> "Inconsolata-g-10")
>                  (setq initial-frame-alist '(
>                    (font . "Monospace-11")
>                  ))
>                  (setq default-frame-alist '(
>                    (font . "Monospace-11")
>                  ))
>                  (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" 'korean-ksc5601
>
> "-unknown-NanumGothicCoding-normal-normal-normal-*-*-*-*-*-d-0-iso10646-1"))
>               ((eq system-type 'windows-nt)
>                (progn
>                  (set-face-attribute 'default nil :font "Consolas 13")
>                  ))
>         )
>         )))
> ```
>
> And when I take this out, maximization works as expected. How should I
> change this so I can have default font set without?
>
> Best,
> Joon
>
>
>

Reply via email to