On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Test User <testuser...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:09:10 +0000 (UTC)
> >
> > Which of the optional libraries used by emacs should my MinGW build
> > be able to use?
>
> See below, I marked them with "<<<".
>
>
>
<snip>


> ImageMagick can currently be used only as a statically linked library,
> since no one made the ImageMagick related code work with dynamic
> run-time loading.
>
> The rest of the optional libraries will all be loaded at run time when
> they are first used.
>
> Note that I marked D-Bus with "<<<<<<" because I heard someone who
> said it worked for them, but I haven't tried that myself, and I very
> much doubt it works reliably on Windows, so caveat emptor.
>
> >   Should Emacs use the GNU version of malloc?             yes  <<<<<<
> >   Should Emacs use a relocating allocator for buffers?    yes  <<<<<<
> >   What window system should Emacs use?                    w32  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use -lXpm?                                   yes  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use -ljpeg?                                  yes  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use -ltiff?                                  yes  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use a gif library?                           no   <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use a png library?                           yes  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use -lrsvg-2?                                yes  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use imagemagick?                             no   <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs support sound?                               yes  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use -ldbus?                                  no   <<<<<<
> [WARNING]
> >   Does Emacs use a file notification library?             yes (w32)
> <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use access control lists?                    yes  <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use -lgnutls?                                no   <<<<<<
> >   Does Emacs use -lxml2?                                  yes  <<<<<<
>
>   Does Emacs use toolkit scroll bars?                     yes  <<<<<<
>

Thanks.

Reply via email to