> I've been trying GLPK for a month now and I have some > suggestions for > enhancement that would make the package more > attractive (at least to me!).
Thank you for suggestions. > > 1) The possibility to specify that the matrix is > symmetric and therefore use > half the storage. I've never met lp/mip problems having symmetric matrices. Could you provide an example? > 2) The possibility to use normal matrix storage > (instead of sparse). For a > dense matrix that would save half the storage again. On api level the user cannot work with the normal matrix. It is implemented internally in the interior-point solver. > 3) The possibility to use an initial point in the > lpx_interior method. Probably this feature would be useful. _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list Help-glpk@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
