Hi Xypron, I have looked through your code. Thank you for your efforts.
Using dynamic libraries is a separate problem, and I think we need to consider it first and separately from implementing database interface. The main difficult is that using dynamic libraries is out of the ISO C standard. A solution could be using libltdl component of GNU Libtool, because it provides portability for many modern platforms. Nevertheless, for various reasons, I would prefer to implement wrapper routines which might be configured for the following four cases: 1) GNU Libtool (libltdl) (see http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html ) 2) The Open Group & IEEE standard (dlopen, etc.) (see http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/nfindex.html ) 3) MS Windows (LoadLibrary, etc.) 4) Null case, if none of the above is available. Wrapper routines follow the OG & IEEE standard: void *xdlopen(const char *file, int mode); void *xdlsym(void *handle, const char *name); int xdlclose(void *handle); const char *xdlerror(void); I plan to implement these routines for next several days. What do you think about that? Andrew Makhorin _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list Help-glpk@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
