D'Agostino, Larry - TX wrote:
>
> Xypron,
>
> How do you propose the patch is incorporated? Do you think maybe as a
> switch on the glpsol binary?
>
Hopefully the coding can be incorporated into the next release. I see no
need for switching the additional features on and off.
Access to the properties of rows and columns will enhance the syntax like
this:
for { r in R } {
for { b in B } {
printf "%3s: ", b;
printf "%6s, %9.3g, %6.3f, %9.3g, %6.3f\n", r,
con_cap[b,r].ub, con_cap[b,r].value, # upper bound, value
con_cap[b,r].lb, con_cap[b,r].dual; # lower bound, dual value
}
}
Best regards
Xypron
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Outputting-dual-cost-from-GLPSOL-tp23979001p24005510.html
Sent from the Gnu - GLPK - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
