Andrew already indicated the LP tolerances to you. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-glpk/2012-06/msg00051.html
Best regards Xypron -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:42:35 +0100 > Betreff: Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:03:35PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > > Which is false, so under this assignment the system in infeasible. The > solver > > should have either tried a different assignment of either variables, or > if it > > could not, then it should have reported the problem infeasible? Right? > > Any thoughts on this? I am keen to figure out what went wrong here. > > Cheers > > -- > Best Regards > Edd Barrett -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list Help-glpk@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
