Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oliver Scholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Yes.
>
> And don't you agree that while they both show available completions,
> icomplete is nowhere near ido when it comes to functionality? Or am I
> missing something?
I don't recall having seen any list of required functionality. I do
remember that somebody wanted to use ido for other sorts of
completion. Such things most of the time mean: people want to have a
particular functionality and express that as "can X also do Y?" So
before we jump on anything without consideration and merge
gnu.emacs.help and emacs-devel, it would be quite more methodical to
find the least difficult way to achieve the required functionality.
Oliver
--
20 VentÃse an 213 de la RÃvolution
LibertÃ, EgalitÃ, FraternitÃ!
_______________________________________________
Help-gnu-emacs mailing list
Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
