Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Isn't this about *development*, i.e. avoiding work-arounds, and not
> about getting some help, including work-arounds?

the best work-around is the one understood enough so that it becomes
unnecesary, but that only happens if the control graph has a back edge.
generally, to help the most, you try to help the earliest.  you are not
stuck in some proprietary software hell where earliest is artificially
bounded.  when you understand this, you may may come to consider that
*everything* (impermanent ;-) is about "development", although it is
known by many other names as well.

thi
_______________________________________________
Help-gnu-emacs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs

Reply via email to