> this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's
> optimized for i586+?

I don't think so. But why do you want i586 binaries, really? For an
application like Emacs, which doesn't do any funny stuff like
heavy-duty number crunching, the performance improvement over binaries
optimized for i386 should be utterly negligible.
_______________________________________________
Help-gnu-emacs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs

Reply via email to