In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "rgb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The lifetimes of the other cells are totally unaffected by the the > let, > > This is where you are obviously wrong as I proved in my example. Are you talking about the example where you bound a symbol with let and then used put to add a property, and then you uninterned the symbol? I already explained why that had the behavior you saw, and it has nothing to do with let affecting the property list. It's because when you uninterned the symbol and then typed the symbol again, you got a different symbol than the one that was in the function. -- Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** _______________________________________________ Help-gnu-emacs mailing list Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
