But I don't think its very efficient that I need to type the buffers name (enventhough I can use TAB to auto complete).
I'm not so sure about that. Of course, in general your mileage may vary, depending on the actual names of your buffers & their order in the buffer list. But I think that in the worst case for typing/autocompleting, tabbing doesn't save any keypresses (anyone care to confirm or deny that statement?), whereas in the best case for typing, tabbing is arbitrarily bad in comparison. Moveover, displaying the buffers you're tabbing through, or even just their names, can be distracting. With typing, you don't see anything you don't have to see. But hey, whatever works for you. Personally I just use one buffer for everything (and no font lock). J/K :) _______________________________________________ Help-gnu-emacs mailing list Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs