Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> [A common reason to edit a patch is because it _won't_ apply otherwise: >> you basically look at the patch to see why doesn't match the source, >> edit the patch to test your guess, and if it then applies cleanly, >> you've got a nice record in the edited patch.] > > In such cases I just prefer to apply the patch and fix the rejects, gives you > a > better overall view.
But that's the whole point -- certain hunks won't apply until you either fix them to apply or fix the source so it can be "applied to"; I prefer the former because it's generally easier to maintain a record of what changed. -Miles -- `Life is a boundless sea of bitterness' _______________________________________________ Help-gnu-emacs mailing list Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
