On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:36:49PM +0200, Roland Winkler wrote:
> Neon Absentius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ideally the multiplication should not be assumed commutative (or the
> > variables invertible) unless explicitly declared so.
>
> Emacs calc (the way I look at it) is designed to be a powerful,
> advanced calculator. But it is not a computer algebra system which I
> would use to address the kind of problem you are talking about..
>
If there is a line between an advanced desk calculator and a CAS then
surely Emacs calc has crossed it! OTOH what are PC's but (glorified)
advanced desk calculators? :)
But (more) seriously what I am talking about is not really that more
complicated than what calc does already. If it can calculate
2 2 2
(x + y) = x + 2 y x + y
then it should be able to do
2 2 2
(x + y) = x + x y + y x + y
> For example. take a look at Maxima, http://www.ma.utexas.edu/maxima.html.
> It's now under GPL, and it even has a nice emacs interface.
Yes I know about maxima and I use it. However I usually prefer calc
for a "quick and dirty" calculation. And I really like the interface.
--
Most precious among the relics remaining of Peter's skeleton in the
Vatican are 29 fragments of one of his skulls. (St. Peter's other
skull is preserved in a reliquary at the Cathedral of St. John
Lateran.)
-- Frank R. Zindler, "Of Bones and Boners"
_______________________________________________
Help-gnu-emacs mailing list
Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
