Thanks for the help. At this stage, I might do better to build gnunet on my box using the source downloaded from the web-site, instead of using the binary packages.
At least I will know how to do it when I'm done. What's your opinion? -----Original Message----- From: Milan Bouchet-Valat [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:15 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Help-gnunet] Ubuntu Binary Package Signatures OK, thanks for the debugging. The problem is that in Debian versioning, 0.4.0~pre1-1 < 0.4.0 because the upstream version is considered as being 0.4.0~pre1. On top of this problem, I can't force Launchpad to build the package using our PPA version of libmicrohttpd, i.e. libmicrohttpd5. The automated ${shlibs:Depends} variable only gets libmicrohttpd4. I'm still struggling to find a solution (maybe building it in Karmic first). Markus, ideas ? _______________________________________________ Help-gnunet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnunet
