-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 11:21 AM, Christian Grothoff wrote: > Hi Calvin, > > You are right, there is no good reason for GNUnet to need any > additional privs on /etc/. I must admit I mostly use it with > ~/.config/gnunet.conf, or some other non-default configuration > file passed via "-c", so I never encountered this particular > issue. > > We should probably just open the *existing* file rw and then > truncate instead of creating a new file. So yes, this is another > (minor) bug that should be fixed. > > I've filed it as bug #3653 so that it is not forgotten: > https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=3653 > > Also, btw, I'm myself not ignoring your previous e-mail, I'm > currently No worries! > working intensely on that connectivity issue which clearly wasn't > nearly as well under control as I had first thought... > > Happy hacking! > > Christian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU0+3FAAoJEPFy53W67dRmfa8QALi7W9Y9CMKlebnqus9ydDhJ rHA4ZJI/VXCZ9c68SPXppvO2kB6FYKrOQkIQt8htzrD0zx5xvkGu9Ac2+DOJvbMk Z7FEjAkFndHZ4ne407Fir+dVMYfs8dAnFLNw/bNSnOf7lxeejsgV6fNRPJePBM6r 5iKv4XO2X5qtiIap3IRahaKeZa8EZNluK+yXE3NV5WU+QiCkCbtIR/9MCPYyfoAm YwrBD5keHH0mFHPpPICAE9CHv/dcNTrWDYrKv8Dwg6LZmjgJQDXBzBvHZySjhGiu gDetwic1+67bMHDqjZchRADuh860lfOP3Gr0O/o6cD5Kx+jNgpeYTD6fbyxpJhMH 13aiwagSkPL5iVRxcP/GQVA/pE3vPgqMyND94Sk6COnR5x2aRAyE+hyoFT/IinKv vbdBPWcmSz1guEBht+pnkeYJfIA6H94N2hrucrlEK5fa1HpQQNyOU375SfEbhfy3 40uRWDmKMo2HcoY6wNCWF7alIPL0Lzu6fGVTDv4UXvOh7tSe+b6m78CbH+bIKi7Z gYB7kAp9ee0rCCjVn3r4JIxj9DH7TnglSusqGupMpHcxQMqFWpH+4k7TmVGSk5vq z6ao1evarjMHybua1zn6Fvkw4QP+8L9k/T+Poobs1EwwUle6ImxkK1OV6tGedMNu R0LiVeYAvUEZ8vEKBBX+ =Geoq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Help-gnunet mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnunet
