On Thu 06 Jul 2006 16:16, Jeremiah Foster wrote: > I think there is a cron shell script fix provided on the debian exim > web site, and I have heard that /dev/urandom is somewhat more secure > on linux than /dev/random, but that the security and efficiency > issues are as you say, that is problematic.
This is a common misunderstanding. /dev/urandom and /dev/random are the same random generator. The only difference is that /dev/random blocks when it thinks there is no entry available. And according to the author it is more "secure". However there is no evidence to support that claim (and currently there is only evidence to the contrary). There are more efficient CPRNGs such as the yarrow (freebsd) which are better studied than the Linux' and considered secure. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list Help-gnutls@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls