2011/6/8 Ted Zlatanov <[email protected]>: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:22:39 +0200 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > <[email protected]> wrote: > NM> The last commit by Stef Walter concludes the list of changes I > NM> planned for gnutls 3.0.0. Those in brief were: > NM> * Addition of a simple X.509 certificate verification subsystem > NM> (gnutls_x509_trust_list_*) > NM> * Addition of a certificate retrieval function that requires no > NM> processing from gnutls (gnutls_certificate_set_retrieve_function2()) > These will be appreciated for the Emacs GnuTLS interface.
If you have any comments on their usage, or think something is missing let me know. > I would like to repeat my request for a string-based configuration > system. Take the priority strings and extend them further, since almost > everything in GnuTLS can be configured that way. You'll need a decent > parser and it may end up as a multi-line format, but please consider > that it's useful. I can see its usefulness in your use-case, but not in a generic case for a typical C program or library that will not be able to utilized them anyway. I still believe that something like that should be built on top of gnutls. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
