On Saturday 30 July 2011 15:53:49 Totony wrote: > Maybe :S (/investigation of aria2 code planned). > (Through, what would be the use of using 2 different crypto backends with > different wrappers ? Compatibility ?) Possibly needs to do some lower crypto operation (e.g. a sha1 operation) and using libgcrypt (directly) was an easy way to do it.
> I assumed this for quite good reasons, but I think I will recheck this > today. > (The maintainer of the Git branch of aria2 I am using said this : "It seems > initialization error of gnutls(which initializes libgcrypt internally), but > I've never met this before". So, even if I'm not really invested in the > coding of that program, I assumed that they used gnutls to take care of the > libgcrypt related scripts (I checked the code a bit, and found calls of the > gnutls functions too)). > Source : http://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/aria2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=135 > and https://github.com/tatsuhiro-t/aria2 It was probably true when gnutls always used gcrypt. Its now (another) bad assumption. In any case, this doesn't look like anything to do with gnutls. Brad _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
