[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Comeau) writes: > Paul Pluzhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>James Kanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> there's really no excuse for any vendor not to have >>> implemented it. >> >>The only people who actually implemented 'export' templates >>(in the EDG frontend) disagree with you > > You're wrong, that document does not say they disagree with James.
It doesn't? The article says: All (Steve, John, Daveed) [when asked by other implementers for advice about how best to implement export]: "Don't." I don't read this as "there is no excuse for any vendor not to have implemented exported templates long time ago", but perhaps my command of the English language is lacking :-( > Furthermore, they argued in its favor when n1426 was discussed in > the committee. That may be true; but (again disagreeing with James) they still don't think this is a good language feature: Steve Adamczyk: "Although we oppose the language feature, ..." Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. _______________________________________________ Help-gplusplus mailing list Help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
