On 24/07/15 21:03, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > В Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:17:17 +0200 > Jelle de Jong <[email protected]> пишет: > >> On 23/07/15 13:14, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Jelle de Jong >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> The problem exist with the combination of mdadm with metadata format 1.2. >>>> >>> >>> Do you mean 1.0 and 1.1 work? Or you did not test them? >> >> I did not test 1.0 or 1.1. I looked at the mdadm manpage and it listed >> metadata format 0 and 1, so I went straight to 0 witch resulted in >> metadata 0.9. >> > > 1.2 puts metadata in fixed location in the beginning of device (i.e. > partition) while 0.9 puts metadata in floating location near end of > device. 1.0 and 1.1 differ in metdata placement as well. Testing would > help to build some hypothesis. So far it sounds like grub has problem > to find where partition begins; in this case metadata 1.0 is expected > to work - it puts it at the end.
http://paste.debian.net/288106/ I tested metadata 1.0 and this also worked as expected. Kind regards, Jelle de Jong _______________________________________________ Help-grub mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-grub
