Can you say more about why you need a C++ wrapper ? I have been using C++ and happy with linking to original GSL, no extra work needed at all (maybe some in the OO design part).
Forest. On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:37 AM, abbott <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if there is an up-to-date free (i.e. GPLed) C++ > interface to (most of) GSL. > > Using a search engine I have found gslwrap and gslcpp, but they both > seem to be a bit old (or dormant). Is there any more recent C++ > interface? If not, am I correct in assuming that gslcpp is better > than gslwrap (since it appears to be much newer)? > > Thanks in advance. > John Abbott > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-gsl mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl > _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
