On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:46:00 +0100, Brian Gough <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > At Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:47:35 -0500, > Waclaw Kusnierczyk wrote: >> I can of course implement this for my project, but a more portable >> solution is preferable. Or, perhaps, I have overlooked in the docs a >> functionality like this already implemented? > > Hi. You haven't overlooked anything. I agree it's more elegant to > have a generic function. I didn't add a feature for it as there's a > limit to how much of an object system I wanted to do in plain C (due > to the risks of void *). If you need it, I'd recommend just to add a > function for it in your application.
Sure, I already have it. It's trivial, I think you might consider adding this sort of code to the library, although with the current design it would have to be added for each structure type-data type combination separately, which is slightly more work. Anyway, thanks for the response. vQ _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list Help-gsl@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl