Well, I am a very strong user of C++. D is a very interesting update for me though. Perhaps it will take time for D to replace C++ (Also C++ users are not much open to many other languages, just like me :)).
Learning C++ to use GSL is a misuse of time, C should be sufficient. Regards, Sumit On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Jerome BENOIT <g62993...@rezozer.net>wrote: > Hello List: > > > On 06/04/12 11:12, Sumit Adhikari wrote: > >> C++ is not needed anywhere until you really need them. For GSL, C is >> sufficient and GSL is very clean. >> > > this is very true. > > Afterwards, D may be considered instead of C++ > > > In any case you will have to learn C > >> before you learn C++. >> > > >> Regards, >> Sumit >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Alexander Gallego<gausst...@gmail.com>** >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> I need to implement the GSL but I'm not sure if I should better learn C >>> or >>> C++ in order to make a correct and fast use of the library. >>> Which language do you recommend? >>> >>> Thanks too much. >>> >>> -- >>> Alexander Gallego C. >>> Instituto de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales. >>> Universidad de Antioquia. >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- Sumit Adhikari, Institute of Computer Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gußhausstraße 27-29,1040 Vienna
