-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Does absence of warranty mean that I can't trust results derived with the help of gsl? Do I have to read the source code first to determine if the library does what it is expected to do? Does this all mean that if I'm not willing to read the source I am not able to use this library to get trustworthy scientific results? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQpipAAoJEK64IL1uI2haFfgH/jOh6FsznS9vDrw/KUQfjCl2 WTQ7FzuQv9HUNRV2OQzj5SKcz4j/zHDMlL35XexWyQcZr24Qg6m9xek/l/WicYjU t8lvj6FmaAuqSXZfkaBR3zG5kVgldZQv/KYOgdJUtOnCFsGRFgokNpq7N7FwFuwq 3rMWD0wBcu2DFmifWlR93NUL7q7lrko+C/qNZ0VLILlPi9h7gz25YJbOiiAfO/eA VYgkiP4Odmy+u35sw3MuTmxTPoAOgh5Op9RZnvTOGnQRBHQznLpNA+y59afhBUsy Hg7YPjDhUo8+T+vX1VKSeIS26NgR41PC6qUZ0QbujGGCCGQQnWG66E3HMUXrpic= =kWEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
