Brian Gladman <brg <at> gladman.plus.com> writes: > > Hi, > > If you believe that this is a GSL issue, would it be possible to produce > a simple example that illustrates the problem? > > Brian Gladman > >
Hi, See my latest followup of my post. With revision 4771, the calculation will slow down. Also, I found that numerical results by 1.16 and 1.15 are different (less than 0.1%). I doubt it is because of revision 4771. I have modified the source code of 1.16 to undo revision 4771. And I found that, without 4771, results by 1.16 and 1.15 are the same with each other. So, I question whether revision 4771 do a better job or a worse job, in terms of accuracy. Alan
