On 10/25/2015 02:14 PM, Patrick Alken wrote:
There is an overwhelming consensus to release gsl-2.0 as soon as possible (and I fully agree), so I've uploaded a test release to: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.99.90.tar.gz ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.99.90.tar.gz.sig All reports are welcome - anyone who can test on various platforms would be appreciated (BSD, Mac OS, Windows). Please try testing the build and also the documentation: 1) ./configure ; make ; make check
oops. see log gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-0ubuntu1~12.04) 4.9.2 3.2.0-92-generic
2) cd doc ; make ps
no error messages
Please report any successes/failures to myself or [email protected]. Thanks, Patrick
========================================== gsl 1.99.90: specfunc/test-suite.log ========================================== # TOTAL: 1 # PASS: 0 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 1 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents:: :depth: 2 FAIL: test ========== FAIL: gsl_sf_bessel_j0_e(1048576.0, &r) [151] expected: 3.1518281938718289e-07 obtained: 3.1518281938718411e-07 +/- 1.3996928921996959e-22 (rel=4.44089e-16) fracdiff: 1.9315930101226345e-15 tolerance: 5.6843418860808015e-14 value/expected not consistent within reported error 3.151828193871841096e-07 1.399692892199695880e-22 FAIL: gsl_sf_bessel_j0_e(1.0e18, &r) [152] expected: -9.9296932074040509e-19 obtained: -9.9281610405300338e-19 +/- 4.4089891917531582e-34 (rel=4.44089e-16) fracdiff: 7.7156718691118246e-05 tolerance: 4.4408920985006262e-16 value/expected not consistent within reported error value not within tolerance of expected value -9.928161040530033804e-19 4.408989191753158201e-34 FAIL: gsl_sf_bessel_j0_e(1.0e20, &r) [153] expected: -6.4525128526578085e-21 obtained: -7.4692189125949288e-21 +/- 3.3169995250914259e-36 (rel=4.44089e-16) fracdiff: 7.3030142878827614e-02 tolerance: 4.4408920985006262e-16 value/expected not consistent within reported error value not within tolerance of expected value -7.469218912594928846e-21 3.316999525091425858e-36 FAIL: Bessel Functions [404]
