Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Sounds good to me. I'm still curious about urgency level semantics. Do >> you know when urgency=medium is applicable? The links I found earlier >> where not that informative, and mostly said that urgency=high is for >> security bugs. > > It's basically the maintainer's tradeoff between the urgency of updating > testing and the desire to make sure the package is thoroughly tested in > unstable. I usually use urgency=medium for serious bugs that don't risk > compromise or data loss, or for major bugs with risky fixes that need to > be tested in unstable for a while. > > Since this is a minimal change that fixes an arguably RC bug and adds > support for a major platform, urgency of high or medium is probably > appropriate here, but I'm not sure that it matters a great deal.
Makes sense, thanks for explaining. What's the next step now, do we wait for 5 days and then ask on debian-release to push it into testing? /Simon _______________________________________________ Help-gss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gss
