Hi Alex, Thank you for this new release. I am enjoying the cool new features!
On 05/24/2018 at 20:21 Alex Kost writes: [...] > I recalled that C-u prefix is already occupied by specifying an > arbitrary profile for the package commands. So, I'm afraid instead of > "C-u M-x guix-dependent-packages" there will be "M-x > guix-direct-dependent-packages". > > Or maybe I should just break this dull "convention" (I mean "C-u" for > profiles) as probably no one uses it anyway :-) +1 FWIW, ISTM this use of "C-u" is more global than typical and thus feels a bit counter-intuitive. Since you have made it very easy to jump between profiles in *Guix Profiles* I think it would be good to switch to using "C-u" for more command-specific modifications. This might also help avoid "function bloat in emacs-guix." HTH - George
