Arun Isaac (2018-08-19 23:38 +0530) wrote: >>> A better approach might be to add it to .dir-locals.el upstream. What do >>> you >>> people think? >> >> I think the less is added to "dir-locals" the better. Especially, there >> shouldn't be any functions there in my opinion. > > Thanks, Alex and Pierre, for your replies. But, why is adding to > dir-locals not a good idea?
It's not a good idea only in my opinion :-) I personally don't like when someone decides what settings I should use so much, that I disable all these dir-locals stuff completely (using 'enable-dir-local-variables' variable). But if I understood this situation correctly, Pierre suggested to: - add a function to the Guix ".dir-locals.el" (does dir-locals support functions at all?) - the function to set up a third-party package (Emacs-Guix)! Why Guix should do it? Both these points doesn't look right to me. -- Alex
