Hello Katherine, Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherin...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. ápr. 6., Szo, 23:16): > > Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: > > > This is really odd and I cannot reproduce this. I wonder if this might > > be related to some unusual file system choices or settings that cause > > Guile to think that the source files are more recent. > > I have accepted that I have somehow gotten myself into a dark corner of > Guix! I was expecting there to be a Guix command that would basically > get any package back into a good state. I was kind of surprised that > `guix build --check` or `guix build --repair` didn't help me out. My > expectation was that maybe this would check the hash of the store with > upstream and rebuild or redownload a substitute. >
I believe you might be looking looking for guix gc --verify, and suboptions thereof. https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-gc.html Does that help? > > Can you show us the mtime of these files? In my case both the scm and > > the go files all have their mtime as 1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 > > +0100. > > One interesting point might be that there are no `.go` files. I would > argue Guile's error message here could use some care, but even a better > error message won't get me to a better spot :) > > Thanks again for the time, Ricardo. > > -- > Katherine > Best regards, g_bor
