Le 7 juin 2019 06:10:57 GMT+02:00, Viet Le <[email protected]> a écrit : >I did look into the cmdliner github and found the fix done 2 months >ago: > >https://github.com/dbuenzli/cmdliner/commit/2e395e35a40178685700d74e5d9529becdafd137 > >Viet > >On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 04:56, Brett Gilio <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Julien Lepiller writes: >> >> > Le 6 juin 2019 08:06:42 GMT+02:00, Julien Lepiller ><[email protected]> >> a écrit : >> >>Le 5 juin 2019 22:21:37 GMT+02:00, Brett Gilio <[email protected]> >a >> >>écrit : >> >>>Hi all, >> >>> >> >>>I like to make meta-packages that I can pass to `guix environment >> >>>--ad-hoc` for development. I have the following meta package for >ocaml >> >>> >> >>>(define-public meta-ocaml >> >>> (package >> >>> (inherit %meta-base) >> >>> (name "meta-ocaml") >> >>> (propagated-inputs >> >>> `(("meta-emacs" ,meta-emacs) >> >>> ("darcs" ,darcs) >> >>> ("dune" ,dune) >> >>> ("emacs-tuareg" ,emacs-tuareg) >> >>> ("gcc-toolchain" ,gcc-toolchain) >> >>> ("m4" ,m4) >> >>> ("make" ,gnu-make) >> >>> ("mercurial" ,mercurial) >> >>> ("ocaml" ,ocaml) >> >>> ("ocaml-base" ,ocaml-base) >> >>> ("ocaml-core" ,ocaml-core) >> >>> ("ocaml-ctypes" ,ocaml-ctypes) >> >>> ("ocaml-findlib" ,ocaml-findlib) >> >>> ("ocaml-merlin" ,ocaml-merlin) >> >>> ("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit) >> >>> ("oocaml-parsexp" >> >>> ,ocaml-parsexp) >> >>> ("ocaml-utop" ,ocaml-utop) >> >>> ("opam" ,opam) >> >>> ("rsync" ,rsync))))) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>When trying to use that in an environment, I am getting the >following >> >>>backtrace claiming there is a collision that I assume is not >getting >> >>>resolved in its usual fashion. >> >>> >> >>>Backtrace: >> >>> 6 (primitive-load >> >>"/gnu/store/k45l4ph58xakp3f52kmridr9wyc…") >> >>>In guix/build/profiles.scm: >> >>> 157:2 5 (build-profile >"/gnu/store/c2khaalrpy7cdyr8k4lawgqnbzs…" >> >>…) >> >>>In unknown file: >> >>> 4 (hash-for-each #<procedure 105c180 at >guix/build/union…> >> >>…) >> >>> 3 (hash-for-each #<procedure 10b3900 at >guix/build/union…> >> >>…) >> >>> 2 (hash-for-each #<procedure 110b180 at >guix/build/union…> >> >>…) >> >>> 1 (hash-for-each #<procedure 14368c0 at >guix/build/union…> >> >>…) >> >>> 0 (scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("union-build: col…" >…) >> >>…) >> >>> >> >>>ERROR: In procedure scm-error: >> >>>union-build: collision between file and directories ((files >> >> >>>>("/gnu/store/h1w5b2l1wny94cnfqm46w12nm3w8wz2k-ocaml-num-1.1/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs")) >> >>>(dirs >> >> >>>>("/gnu/store/93lp6k3d58dfc8gvx9zd70szapsb5kv6-ocaml-base-0.11.1/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/7vrg8apsnl6hg9vsszpgcq4ymvz9whap-ocaml-core-0.11.3/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/iz6wzz9sm4qnal2wlqi66blm8mb35zxv-ocaml-core-kernel-0.11.1/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/zrpcrfrmyanhqpvhxkclpgiq2sp7k1ip-ocaml-bin-prot-0.11.0/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/n70q0ypcv74vpwdd0354rjxi7mv9y1rf-ocaml-ppx-inline-test-0.12.0/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/q42ayh04wy70pl2xdm2yp2i0s8yh5g7b-ocaml-ppx-expect-0.12.0/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/cwijnaplps7zbby3xq21spjk4fgxpd35-ocaml-spawn-0.13.0/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/09b6pfbw3n1j2qqni822wjjixh48qwfp-ocaml-lambda-term-1.13/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/zlibrm9b6pa8hgwmjigzwm2cq3kb4y1r-ocaml-lwt-4.1.0/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/qzkydyr8rrbpfk2lfjynnhgdbavf4kh0-ocaml-ssl-0.5.7/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/sqkcaap13wgbjdqnjia8hi12rf2p5qf1-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs" >> >> >>>>"/gnu/store/wnl6maf9s6ksvszyy9q2bz0psiy1h15j-ocaml-mccs-1.1+9/lib/ocaml/site-lib/stublibs"))) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>If formatting is bad in this email, here are plaintext pastes. >> >>> >> >>>meta-packages.scm : http://ix.io/1L1A >> >>> >> >>>backtrace : http://ix.io/1L1B >> >> >> >>Looks like ocaml-num's stubslib is a file, but it should be a >> >>directory. I'll investigate, thanks for reporting this! >> > >> > This is now fixed in master. I also found a reproducibility issue >in >> cmdliner while making sure my change didn't break anything and it's >also >> fixed in Guix, and a patch was sent upstream :) >> > >> > So you can run guix pull and enjoy your metapackage! >> >> Thanks Julien! >> >> -- >Kind regards, >Viet
Indeed, I didn't look hard enough :)
