Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道:
As noted on IRC: I've mirrored that file from a debian system[0]. Whata mess: it's *almost* <https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Clarified_Artistic_License_1.0>, but not actually the same (e.g. points 3.e & 4.e are missing).Considering this is what Debian calls the ‘Artistic’ licence, though, we can be almost certain that other Guix packages have the same subtledifference already.
It turns out that what text I had found on-line as the ‘Artistic 1.0’ licence was either bogus or mislabelled. It does seem to be the (non-free!) Artistic 1.0 licence.
Kind regards, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature