On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:56:50 +0330 Reza Alizadeh Majd <r.m...@pantherx.org> wrote:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (define %cuirass-specs > #~(list > '((#:name . "my-manifest") > (#:load-path-inputs . ("guix")) > (#:package-path-inputs . ()) > (#:proc-input . "guix") > (#:proc-file . "build-aux/cuirass/gnu-system.scm") > (#:proc . cuirass-jobs) > (#:proc-args . ((subset . "manifests") > (systems . ("x86_64-linux")) > (manifests . (("config" . "manifest.scm"))))) > (#:inputs . (((#:name . "guix") > (#:url . "git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git") > (#:load-path . ".") > (#:branch . "master") > (#:no-compile? . #t)) > ((#:name . "config") > (#:url . > "https://github.com/ramajd/guix-manifest.git") (#:load-path . ".") > (#:branch . "master") > (#:no-compile? . #t))))))) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- add the `(#:build-outputs . ())` to my specification definition, cuirass added my specification to the list of it's build specs. my current problem is that status of added jobs are `scheduled` and I receive following message on cuirass logs: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 2020-11-27T15:14:19 evaluation 1 for 'my-manifest' completed 2020-11-27T15:14:19 building 2 jobs for 'my-manifest' 2020-11-27T15:14:19 Registering builds for evaluation 1. 2020-11-27T15:14:19 evaluation 1 registration took 0.001742 seconds 2020-11-27T15:14:19 evaluation 1 registered 2 new derivations 2020-11-27T15:14:19 building 2 derivations in batches of 200 2020-11-27T15:14:19 building batch of 200 derivations (0/2) 2020-11-27T15:14:20 done with 2 derivations 2020-11-27T15:14:20 outputs: /gnu/store/220zbr30p8yj6yg9ndkk7a537x6f4vir-ungoogled-chromium-87.0.4280.66-0.1f7cdef /gnu/store/a462kby1q51ndvxdv3b6p0rsixxrgx1h-hello-2.10 2020-11-27T15:14:20 success: 0, fail: 2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I assume this happened because that my server used available substitutes from Guix substitute server, instead of building them by itself. is that right? if not, is there any further thing that I need to apply on my spec definition? Regards, Reza -- Reza Alizadeh Majd PantherX Team https://www.pantherx.org/