Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>>> But there is conflicting advice over what packages should or shouldn't
>>> be installed typically some combinaton of:
>>> texlive-base, texlive-bin, texlive-latex-base, texlive-latext-font
>>>
>>> The latest advice seems to be the only texlive-base should be necessary
>>> and installing others will cause an issue - with that in mind I
>>> attempted the below, but got a new failure.
>>
>> “texlive-base” is certainly not sufficient for any real world LaTeX
>> document. It contains what LaTeX developers consider the base set of
>> files (i.e. texlive-latex-base), texlive-bin (which provides the
>> executables), and LaTeX packages from the “required” set.
>
> this is what I use:
[…]
> ("texlive" ,texlive)
This is the monolithic 3+GB package, not the modular texlive.
--
Ricardo
