Edouard Klein <e...@rdklein.fr> writes: > Hi ! > > The real problem will not be the languages (guile or C++), but the > system calls used by Guix.
Ahh! Thanks for pointing that out! > > Guix makes use of some recent (less than 2 decades) and somewhat > advanced features of the Linux kernel, such as namespaces. True true! > > To port Guix to another operating system such as BSD (including OSX), > one would have to translate these calls. > > For example, Guix is the only software I've actually encountered that > can not run in SmartOS' emulation of Linux, because the system calls it > uses are not implemented there. > > I would love for Guix to be a Multi Kernel package manager (I mean it > works on the Hurd also, but I have never encountered a Hurd user in real > life). My dream would be to port Guix to Plan 9 ;-) Why Plan 9? May I ask? And I do really like the Hurd, but I use the dvorak keyboard layout. My understanding is that the Hurd does not support variant keyboard layouts yet... :( I actually think that the Guix developers may want to consider a port to the OpenBSD kernel, provided that the Hyperbola developers get HyperbolaBSD working. Though I guess the Debian guys sort of did already. :) https://www.hyperbola.info/news/announcing-hyperbolabsd-roadmap/ > > jbra...@dismail.de writes: > >> June 24, 2021 2:26 PM, "Patricio MartÃnez" <maxx...@disroot.org> wrote: >> >>> Do anyone know the posibilities about install Guix on another system >>> diferent of Linux? >> >> Awesome! I love speculating on topics I know virtually nothing about! Most >> of my information comes from a mailing list thread that is about a year old. >> So the situation may be better than I describe it. :) >> >> The easiest way is to use GNU Guix on Windows is WSL (Windows subsystem >> for Linux): >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/guile-user@gnu.org/msg12167.html >> >> I'm not a big fan of that, because of Window's history of "embrace, extend, >> extinguish." And that only lets you run Guix in Windows...what about Mac? >> The Hurd? React Os? Redox Os? >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/guile-user@gnu.org/msg12173.html >> >> >> GNU Guix runs entirely on GNU Guile with some C++ for the build daemon. >> >> C++ is fairly portable. That bit should be possible to port, though I >> believe that the development plan is to eventually rewrite the C++ build >> daemon in GNU Guile. >> >> GNU Guile is the tricky bit. To the best of my knowledge, the newer >> versions of GNU Guile run exclusively on GNU/Linux, which is NOT the >> fault of the Guile developers! It's REALLY HARD to port things to all >> OSes. None of the Guile developers are paid for their fabulous work. >> And it's not like Windows or Mac make it easy to port to their platform. >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/guile-user@gnu.org/msg12172.html >> >> Though, the Lilypond developers did get guile 2.2 version working on Windows. >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/guile-user@gnu.org/msg12163.html >> >> So did the gnucash guys for GNU Guile 2.2, but it is fairly tough to >> get it to build: >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/guile-user@gnu.org/msg12164.html >> >> Also, it's a 32-bit GNU Guile that was ported to windows and it does >> not supports thread. >> >> Also Guile 3.0's JIT works on lightening, which is a C library (program ?). >> And I do not know if that supports Windows. But C is really portable. :) >> >>> Thanks you very much and sorry for my english >> >> It was marvelous English! You should teach it! > -- Joshua Branson (joshuaBPMan in #guix) Sent from Emacs and Gnus https://gnucode.me https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels https://propernaming.org "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar