> TK tkp...@protonmail.com writes: > > > After some more investigation, I think I narrowed down the > > > > issue. Package texlive-inconsolata indeed installs the `t1-zi4r-0' font. > > However, the` map' for that font exists only under dvips, not in > > > > the pdftex subdir. > > We’re generating these map files based on the contents of the profile. > > We’re using a profile hook for this. > > > I am not a TeX magus, but it is indicative that the file on the > > > > official TeXLive repo > > > > https://tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/texmf-dist/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map > > > > does contain `zi4' entries. > > We don’t use that file because it contains everything; instead we > > generate it in a profile hook so that it only contains entries that > > correspond to what has actually been installed. > > > Shouldn't the installation of texlive-inconsolata put the > > > > corresponding entries into `pdftex.map'? > > Yes, it should. > > > Any hints on where to go from here? > > When I do > > guix shell -C texlive-base texlive-inconsolata > > I see that > > $GUIX_ENVIRONMENT/share/texmf-dist/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map > > contains entries for the inconsolata fonts. > > (The profile hook depends on texlive-base.) > > -- > > Ricardo
Hi Ricardo, Thanks for narrowing it down. It turns out that replacing `texlive-tiny' with `texlive-base' in the manifest did the trick. So, the message for future readers is, if you want your own subset of TexLive, start with `texlive-base' in your manifest, then add whichever other packages, or fonts you need. Cheers, T
