"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <[email protected]> writes:
> [email protected] writes: >> Nope. I'm using 64 bit. :) I did delete old package profiles and >> system configurations followed by a guix gc. >> >> Lots of stuff got deleted. Maybe that'll help. >> > > guix gc “should” not make a difference, except sometimes software like > Icecat addons do embed store paths in user profiles. Then guix gc > breaks these. I think it'll make a difference on my server, where I am also having issues updating. / was 99% full. :) It also only has 2GB of RAM with maybe 20GB hard drive. So it is about the mimimal hardware that guix system works. Maybe that's part of my issue. I could increase the hard drive size. My laptop should be easier to update. 8GB of RAM, 1TB SSD. I'll figure it out eventually. >> I'll probably end up using my own guide to properly update. >> >> https://gnucode.me/guix-deploy-failed-to-update-my-guix-server.html >> >> Joshua > > This “building guix from source” you suggest is a good escape hatch! > > Oh yeah, sorry to hear of these troubles. Old versions of Guix had one > important difference for example: The “builtin:git-download” builtin > builder for git downloads got added into the guix-daemon. Therefore, > whether a guix-daemon with/without this feature is running changes > the derivation hash, therefore substitutes do not fit anymore. > > commit 59587e2fda76c19b424fda9a987ff90d52ef217e > Author: Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> > Date: Thu Sep 28 10:50:14 2023 +0200 > > gnu: guix: Update to d0438fc. > > This adds the “builtin:git-download” derivation builder to guix-daemon, > added in commit 13b0cf85eb31e1b1ea674debbbfb0f35a32d1374. > > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix): Update to d0438fc. > > Regards, > Florian Not meant as a criticism to guix...but I actually prefer NOT to use guix on my librem 5. apt vs. guix performance is wildly different! May I ask why apt is SOOOOOO much faster? Joshua -- Joshua Branson Sent from the Hurd
