Hi Ian

Ian Eure <[email protected]> writes:
> I think there’s actually a documentation issue, this whole section is
> worded very strangely.  It looks like `@ref{G-Expressions}' is being
> represented as "see G-Expressions" in the text for some reason.
>
> The relevant part of the docs is this, though:
>
>    The procedure should return a string or *note G-Expressions::
>    that
>    represents the content that will be serialized to the
>    configuration file.
>
> Which should properly say "a string or g-expression."

Yes, you're right. I missed the "a string or". I must have read this
part too quickly and missed this point.



Thank you very much four your help.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to