On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:42:17PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 01:20:36PM -0600, Steven Barker wrote: > > Another possiblility is to wait for after woody releases and lobby for > > complete abandonment of the /usr/X11R6 hierarchy in Debian. Brandon's > > not opposed to it, > > That's true. Me neither! :) This is by far the best solution right now. > If we get a binutils with runpath support, that will work fine, too. But > that will take some time, I guess :-/
I agree this would be an easy way to fix the problem, but I also think that there's nothing wrong with having /X11R6. I think this kind of separation is quite useful (unlike /usr) because the user knows, for instance, that a lib in /X11R6/lib is for X clients and that programs in /X11R6/bin are all either X clients or programs related to the X server. Also, "rm -rf /X11R6" should remove eveything related to X... Does Debian have a policy on the whole directory hierarchy? ;) Cheers, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
