On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:02:16AM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 05:43:09PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:36:02PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > > > I assume I'm using the term 'bootstrap filesystem' correctly > > > > here. Is this term acceptable for policy use? > > > > > > I'm not sure it's better than "root filesystem". > > > > Sometimes <Richard Kreuter writes too much about ambiguity> > > Still bootstrap filesystem has the same problem. The problem lies in > the the word filesystem. What about "root partition/store" and "root > directory"?
You're right. Then should we say something like "Creation of files on the root partition is discouraged" or similar? New, little stuff: For the GNU annex: several utilities are required for boot or restoration of GNU/Hurd, and so should be required in /bin: settrans, showtrans, fsysopts, devprobe, others? Richard _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
