Manu Valderrama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This means that a port name can contain both receive and send right; > when a send once right > is needed, every send one right must have its own port name ( send > once right is different ). > Is this the idea ? I hope yes!
Yes, this is correct. Note that send-once rights are different: they are always unique names (which provides for a few important optimizations). > In this case it would be more easy to allocate the port in this way ( > I have made it, and > it has worked ) : > > mach_port_allocate( mach_task_self(), > MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE|MACH_PORT_RIGHT_SEND, &receive_port > ); _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
