Oystein Viggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * [Thomas Bushnell, BSG] > > > Quite right. When asked about the per-process namespaces of Plan 9, > > and whether the Hurd has that, I used to say something like "fakeroot > > will solve that". That's about 50% dodge and 50% real. > > I thought the general mantra was "shadowfs will solve that"?
Seems there are lot of tools that can be used to get something similar to plan 9. My answer would be firmlinks + plain chroot, I think. /Niels _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
