On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:45:30PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:33:31PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > fine! i still like having a separate list of api-porting-related bugs in > > debian BTS, but as Marcus said Savannah is the canonical place. > > I hope you aer talking about bugs in the Hurd and GNU Mach (and MiG, and > whatever other components we come up with).
I'm mostly talking about the Hurd (for the libraries) and Glibc > This depends. If it is a genuine bug in the latest CVS (and are prepared to > deal with any responses from the hackers), you can try libc-alpha. Otherwise > you should use the Debian BTS. Using the Debian BTS seems the simplest option as of now. what do the Gentoo people think about it? > tags for bug reports will be created when I (or some other hacker) feel the > need for it. How and which tags are created follows an undocumented pattern > that only exists in my head (and even there only vaguely). I just meant putting an agreed string in the bug description heard, like "[porting]" or the like. -- Robert Millan make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop. Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
